News & Insights
The year is 2026, and large language models are more pervasive than ever. They are generating code, composing emails, trading crypto memes, you name it. But behind the curtain of cool AI demos lies a hard truth: serving these models isn’t cheap. In fact, inference (the process of running a model to get answers) has quietly become the dominant cost and technical challenge in AI deployment.
Today’s cutting-edge models boast massive context windows and trillions of parameters, powering everything from open-source coding agents to personal AI sidekicks. In this post, we explore why inference efficiency is the critical focus in 2026, and why a sovereign neo-cloud like BUZZ HPC is uniquely positioned to conquer this new frontier.
Not long ago, 2,048 tokens of context (roughly a few pages of text) felt luxurious for an AI model. Now we have models flaunting 100,000-token or even million-token context windows [1]. This is amazing. It means an AI can read a novel or hold weeks of conversation history without forgetting. But it’s also a nightmare for efficiency.
Why? Because the computational cost of self-attention scales quadratically with context length. In practical terms, a model like GPT-4 jumping from an 8k context to 128k context imposes a 64x increase in computation for each token generated [2]. Multiply that by millions of users and you have a scalability crisis.
The obvious question is: can’t we just throw more GPUs at it? Sure, if you’re made of money. The cost per token (think of it as the price of generating about a third of an average word) skyrockets with longer contexts. OpenAI famously charged a premium for 32k-plus contexts because the compute burn was so high [2]. Some models promise million-token contexts, but without architectural innovations to tame the complexity, they are economically unviable to run at scale [2].
In other words, that jumbo context might be a great demo, but it could set your wallet on fire in production.
Researchers are acutely aware of this long-context dilemma and are scrambling for solutions. One area of focus is sparsifying or compressing the context so the model doesn’t attend to every single token in memory. Techniques for KV cache compression aim to reduce the memory and compute overhead of remembering all those tokens.
Recent studies note that as context lengths push into the hundreds of thousands, the key-value (KV) cache becomes a critical bottleneck, consuming memory and slowing throughput [1][3]. The KV cache stores hidden representations for each past token so the model can attend back to them. A long conversation or document means massive KV tensors occupying precious GPU memory.
To tackle this, researchers have proposed approaches such as KV eviction (discarding less important tokens) and sparse KV loading (keeping the full history but only loading relevant segments when needed) [4][5]. One recent work clusters tokens by semantic similarity and retrieves only relevant groups of past tokens instead of attending to all of them [5].
On the engineering side, several optimizations are already paying dividends. Multi-Query Attention (MQA) shares a single set of key and value vectors across attention heads, reducing KV cache size by up to 8x with minimal accuracy loss [6]. Meta’s LLaMA 2 and newer models adopted MQA for this reason.
Another technique, PagedAttention, treats the KV cache like virtual memory, swapping infrequently used blocks to avoid memory bloat. PagedAttention can reduce KV memory usage by roughly 55% [6], effectively doubling usable context length within the same GPU memory budget.
The cutting edge in 2026 is making long-context models efficient, combining algorithmic innovation, software optimization, and advanced hardware. With great power comes great responsibility, and a giant invoice if you’re not careful.
If you’ve run a large model locally or even via API, you might have noticed something odd. Longer conversations start to lag, and memory usage shoots up even though the model size hasn’t changed. That’s the KV cache at work. Every new token the model generates has to store a Key and a Value vector for each layer of the transformer, so that on the next token, the model can attend to all previous tokens.
In plain English: the more you say, the more the model remembers, and those memories pile up in VRAM.
By the end of a 100k token context, the model is effectively lugging around a backpack filled with the embeddings of every one of those tokens. No wonder it gets slower and heavier!
This “memory backpack” means the limiting factor for many long-running or long-context AI applications isn’t usually raw compute, rather, it is memory and bandwidth. As an example, a 70 billion parameter model in 16-bit precision already needs around 140GB just for the weights; add a long conversation and the KV cache can easily add tens or hundreds of GB more[7]. If your hardware doesn’t have that kind of memory, you end up at best sharding the model across multiple GPUs, which introduces costly synchronization overhead.
For example, a 70B-parameter model in 16-bit precision requires roughly 140 GB just for weights. A long context can add tens or even hundreds of gigabytes more in KV cache [7]. Without sufficient memory, models must be sharded across GPUs, introducing synchronization overhead and reducing performance. It’s a lose-lose: either pay for enormous memory or pay in speed and complexity for multi-GPU setups!
Engineers are fighting back with both hardware and software approaches.
On the hardware side, the push is for GPUs with massive memory and bandwidth. NVIDIA’s H100 80GB was a big step, but even it can’t fit a 70B model plus a big context without splitting load. Meanwhile, other players like AMD’s MI300X offer 192GB on one card at a theoretically lower price point than NVIDIA, albeit with a still-maturing software ecosystem[9]. These beefy GPUs are basically saying “throw your largest model at me, I can take it.” And in 2026, if you’re serious about long contexts or chatty AI agents, you will want to get your hands on these big-memory monsters!
On the software side, we already touched on tricks like MQA and PagedAttention reducing the KV footprint. Another emerging idea is streaming or segmenting contexts. Instead of feeding the model one gigantic context, break the interaction into chunks and summarize or selectively carry over state between chunks. Some open-source efforts and research prototypes use an RNN-like state or external memory to avoid the linear growth of the KV cache. These approaches are still experimental, but they hint at a future where context length becomes elastic rather than fixed.
Training a model is a one-time expense. Serving it is an ongoing drain. OpenAI reportedly spends about $0.00012 in GPU resources per token generated by ChatGPT [11]. That sounds tiny until you scale to millions of users.
Industry analyses have pointed out the stark difference between efficient infrastructure and mediocre infrastructure: the best-in-class can be nearly an order of magnitude cheaper per token.
OpenAI, with custom optimizations and perhaps sweetheart hardware deals, might achieve $0.0001-ish per token, while a less optimized setup can be around $0.001[12]. That 10x gap is make or break! The difference between turning a profit or going bankrupt when you have scale.
One analysis framed it this way: the difference between $0.0001 and $0.001 per token translates to millions of dollars in monthly costs for a medium deployment[12]. It’s literally survival. No wonder that in board meetings and engineering stand-ups alike, cost-per-token has become the metric to watch!
Anthropic, riding high with Claude, at one point was reported to be burning on the order of $2.7 million every single day just to serve their users[13]. That’s daily infrastructure cost, not yearly. Why so high? Well, Claude’s an advanced model and they offer a generous context and usage to subscribers! It chews through a lot of GPU hours. Even with a $200/month Claude Pro subscription, the math can be brutal if each user uses a ton of tokens.
Similarly, rumor has it Google’s next-gen Gemini model might be racking up over $5 billion in annual infrastructure cost if serving at full scale[13] – and that’s Google, who basically builds their own TPUs and optimized silicon! These numbers underscore the point: AI companies are effectively becoming compute companies, and their profit margins (or losses) depend heavily on how well they optimize that compute serving.
So how do you optimize cost-per-token?
We’ve already covered some methods: better hardware utilization is huge (keep those GPUs busy with batching, for instance). Fun fact: serving one user at a time on a GPU wastes most of its power, since a lot of time is spent waiting on memory transfers. If you instead batch, say, 32 requests together, you can amortize overhead and cut per-token cost by ~85% (with only a minor hit to latency)[14]. This is why savvy AI cloud providers and SaaS companies use dynamic batching: group user requests on the fly to maximize throughput. The trade-off is a slight delay to accumulate a batch, but you save a fortune in compute. By 2026, techniques like speculative decoding (having a smaller model predict multiple tokens in advance) are also finally deployed to boost throughput by 2–3x for certain tasks like code generation[15], further driving down the cost per token (at the expense of some extra complexity and vRAM for the drafting model).
Then there’s quantization – essentially making the model math “cheaper” by using lower precision. Modern quantization methods can often compress models to 8-bit or even 4-bit weights while retaining “~99%” of the original accuracy, yielding a 75% reduction in inference costs[16]. In 2026, if you’re running a model in production without some form of quantization (or efficient low-precision routines), you’re leaving serious money on the table.
We also have the nuclear option for cost: Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, which can activate only parts of the network for each token. In theory, MoEs let you have a gargantuan model (hundreds of billions of parameters) but only use, say, 10% of it for any given input, potentially giving you an 80-90% reduction in compute per token[17].
If accuracy is king for model training, then efficiency is king for model deployment. Every architectural trick, every hardware upgrade, every clever batching or caching strategy is ultimately in service of driving down the cost per token without sacrificing too much quality. Those that succeed will thrive with scalable AI products; those that don’t will drown in their server bills.
As one commentator quipped, the AI industry is undergoing “token burnout” where even as per-token prices drop, total tokens used are rising even faster[19] (AKA: Jevons Paradox!). So, optimizing both ends (making each token cheaper and being smart about how many tokens you use) is now a core part of AI systems design.
Efficiency is no longer optional. It is survival.
While big companies battle it out for enterprise AI dominance, an open-source revolution has been brewing at the grassroots. In late 2025 and early 2026, we saw the explosive emergence of AI coding agents and personal AI assistants that anyone can run (at least anyone with a beefy enough machine). These projects have whimsical names like OpenCode, Clawdbot / Moltbot, and others, but they all share the same DNA: they are harnesses that put a powerful LLM “brain” to work doing useful tasks for you, under your control.
Take OpenCode, for example. It’s an open-source CLI and desktop tool that acts as an AI pair programmer right inside your terminal. It caught on like wildfire among developers. With over 80,000 stars on GitHub and a massive community [20], OpenCode proved that developers want AI coding assistants that aren’t locked behind proprietary IDE extensions.
OpenCode lets you plug in any model you want, then chat with it to write, refactor, and reason about code directly inside your project directory [21]. It respects your entire codebase context, integrates with version control, runs shell commands, and understands project structure. In short, it’s “Claude Code meets VS Code meets Bash,” all wrapped into one open package.
Developers love the freedom. Hit an API rate limit on one service? Switch models. Privacy concerns? Point it at a local LLM or a private server. No single vendor can pull the rug out from under you because the tool is yours [22]. This ethos is a bit of a rebellion against the closed, cloud-locked AI products of the early 2020s.
Then there’s Clawdbot, later rebranded as Moltbot after Anthropic objected to the name collision. This project was essentially “Claude with hands” or, after the lobster-themed rebrand, claws. It turned a standard chatbot into a full-blown personal AI assistant that could take actions [23].
Moltbot had persistent memory, could browse the web, control apps, send messages, write code, and chain tool calls together by giving the AI permission to execute commands [24]. People went nuts for it. The project crossed 60,000+ GitHub stars in just a few months [25], making it one of the fastest-growing open-source AI projects ever. Even Andrej Karpathy publicly praised it [26].
In a sea of locked-down SaaS AI tools, Moltbot felt punk rock. It sent a clear message: “I want an AI that works for me.”
But these powerful DIY AI agents come with a catch.
To use them at full potential, you need serious compute. Running a coding assistant that understands an entire codebase and can reason deeply isn’t trivial. Use a small local model and results suffer. Use a frontier model and you either pay massive API bills or need access to powerful GPUs.
Moltbot technically supports running fully local models, and yes, some brave souls tried running LLaMA 2 70B at home. In reality, most users piped requests to cloud APIs because very few people have an A100 sitting under their desk.
This is where sovereign neo-clouds step in.
Platforms like BUZZ HPC recognize a growing class of developers and organizations that want the best of both worlds: the control and privacy of self-hosting, combined with access to cutting-edge GPUs they can’t afford outright. BUZZ HPC is building massive, fully domestic GPU infrastructure in Canada, allowing users to rent time on the latest NVIDIA clusters (H100s, Blackwell GPUs, and beyond) on demand [28][29].
It’s “cloud” in the sense of elastic resources, but sovereign in that data stays in-country and workloads aren’t mixed with ad-tech pipelines or foreign government tenants. For Canadians (and privacy-conscious users everywhere), that’s a big deal.
You can run OpenCode or Moltbot on dedicated GPU horsepower, under strict data residency guarantees, while still benefiting from hyperscaler-class performance. And because BUZZ HPC’s infrastructure is purpose-built for AI, not generic cloud sprawl, everything is optimized for inference efficiency. Liquid-cooled racks, high-bandwidth InfiniBand networking, and tightly packed parallel workloads keep GPUs busy and costs down.
Try running one of these agentic systems on a laptop or cheap VM and you’re going to have a bad time. Want OpenCode to index a large monorepo? That means embedding and vectorizing thousands of files. Want Moltbot to manage long conversations and dozens of tool calls? You’ll need VRAM for the KV cache and fast inference.
BUZZ HPC makes these tools viable for real-world use. Indie developers get access to the same class of infrastructure as large enterprises, without compromising on model size or context length.
These open tools have also started putting real pressure on the big AI providers. There’s been no shortage of drama around “harnesses,” community-built connectors that let people use AI services in ways vendors didn’t originally intend.
A notable example was the surge of third-party clients accessing Anthropic’s Claude Code subscription, which offered unlimited usage for around $200 per month and was intended for solo developers [30]. Tools like Cursor and others began routing significant workloads through it, undercutting Anthropic’s pay-per-token API pricing.
Anthropic responded by cracking down, blocking unofficial clients and reportedly sending legal threats to developers reverse-engineering their tools [31]. The Moltbot saga itself involved trademark complaints that forced a rebrand and briefly disrupted the project [32]. High-profile developers, including DHH of Basecamp, publicly criticized these moves as customer-hostile [33].
The takeaway for many developers was clear: relying too heavily on a single proprietary AI provider is risky. Terms can change. Access can disappear. Prices can spike overnight [34].
As a result, demand for model sovereignty and flexibility is surging. Developers want AI systems they control. Open-source models running on independent infrastructure satisfy that need. You can spin up a 40B-parameter model on BUZZ HPC, wire it into OpenCode or your own agent, and know that no one is going to nerf it or revoke access.
This is AI on your terms.
If there’s one recurring theme here, it’s this: inference efficiency demands both elite hardware and smart systems engineering. That’s where specialized AI clouds like BUZZ HPC shine.
BUZZ HPC isn’t juggling general-purpose VMs, databases, and web hosting. It’s laser-focused on one thing: running AI workloads fast and cheap. In partnership with Dell and Bell Canada, BUZZ HPC is deploying liquid-cooled PowerEdge GPU servers packed with NVIDIA Hopper and next-gen Blackwell GPUs [28][35].
By the end of 2026, BUZZ HPC expects to operate over 6,000 next-generation GPUs, scaling to more than 11,000 total GPUs including existing capacity [36][37]. The cluster has already earned a bronze ranking in Semianalysis’ ClusterMax benchmark [38], putting it among the most powerful independent AI clouds globally.
As a sovereign neo-cloud, BUZZ HPC keeps workloads under Canadian jurisdiction, a major advantage for healthcare, finance, government, and any organization with serious privacy requirements. Their AI Fabric is explicitly designed for sovereignty, compliance, and trust [29].
Just as importantly, BUZZ HPC doesn’t lock you into a specific model or framework. Bring your own model. Use open-source, proprietary APIs, or hybrids. The cloud provides the muscle, not the rules.
We’ve reached the point where inference optimization is no longer a nice technical upgrade. It’s a business requirement and, increasingly, an environmental one. Wasteful AI means unnecessary energy use, higher costs, and weaker products. The upside is that this pressure is driving real innovation across the entire stack. Smarter model architectures that do more with less. System-level improvements that handle long context efficiently. An all-out race in GPU design focused on memory, throughput, and efficiency.
If you’re building an AI-powered product, efficiency has to be a first-class concern. You can’t treat inference like a black box and simply absorb whatever it costs. That path leads to runaway cloud bills, feature restrictions, or painful compromises. Instead, design deliberately. Be thoughtful about context length. Choose models carefully. Bigger is not always better if a smaller, well-tuned model solves the problem. Use retrieval instead of brute-force context. Batch and cache aggressively when serving many users. And above all, benchmark and profile. Small engineering changes can deliver massive gains.
This is where platform choice becomes a force multiplier. A platform like BUZZ HPC’s AI cloud amplifies every optimization you make. With access to state-of-the-art GPUs, optimized scheduling, and infrastructure designed specifically for AI workloads, you start ahead of the curve. BUZZ HPC is constantly rolling out newer, faster hardware and applying performance techniques like KV cache reduction and quantization behind the scenes, so teams can focus on building, not firefighting. Add in sovereignty, predictable pricing, and real support, and you get infrastructure that works with you, not against you.
In a few years, users won’t remember which product answered 50 milliseconds faster. They will remember which AI service shut down because it couldn’t afford its own success, or which product felt slow and constrained because the infrastructure couldn’t keep up. The uncomfortable truth is that many AI startups will fail by ignoring efficiency. But for the teams that adapt and optimize, the upside is enormous.
We’re bullish. With open innovation pushing the frontier and specialized AI clouds like BUZZ HPC bending the cost curve, we’re unlocking AI systems that are not just more powerful, but more sustainable and scalable.
“Optimize or die” may sound harsh, but it’s really an invitation to build smarter and go further.
If you need us, BuzzHPC will be in the garage, tuning the engines for the next lap. 🏎️💨
Sources:
[1] [3] [4] [5] stat.berkeley.edu
https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~mmahoney/pubs/2025.acl-long.1568.pdf
[2] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] Cost Per Token Analysis | Introl Blog
https://introl.com/blog/cost-per-token-llm-inference-optimization
[19] Token Burnout: Why AI Costs Are Climbing and How Product ...
https://labs.adaline.ai/p/token-burnout-why-ai-costs-are-climbing
[20] OpenCode | The open source AI coding agent
https://opencode.ai/
[21] [22] OpenCode: The Terminal-Native AI Coding Agent That Actually Gets It | by ˗ˏˋ Ananya Hegde´ˎ˗ | Jan, 2026 | Medium
https://medium.com/@ananyavhegde2001/opencode-the-terminal-native-ai-coding-agent-that-actually-gets-it-5260c7ea8908
[23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [31] [32] [33] [34] From Clawdbot to Moltbot: How a C&D, Crypto Scammers, and 10 Seconds of Chaos Took Down the Internet's Hottest AI Project - DEV Community
https://dev.to/sivarampg/from-clawdbot-to-moltbot-how-a-cd-crypto-scammers-and-10-seconds-of-chaos-took-down-the-4eck
[28] [29] [40] Buzz HPC and Bell Canada partner for Nvidia AI deployment - DCD
https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/buzz-hpc-and-bell-canada-partner-for-nvidia-ai-deployment/
[30] Anthropic blocks third-party use of Claude Code subscriptions
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46549823
[35] [36] [37] [38] HIVE Digital Technologies Subsidiary, BUZZ High Performance Computing, Accelerates Canada’s AI Industrial Revolution with Dell Technologies for its AI
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hive-digital-technologies-subsidiary-buzz-high-performance-ldpsc
[39] Dell PowerEdge XE9680L Rack Server | 2x 5th Gen Intel Xeon
https://marketplace.uvation.com/dell-poweredge-xe9680l-rack-server-2x-5th-gen-intel-xeon-scalable/?srsltid=AfmBOorMMxPqR7jP3gKKhoXTpt1Y2ZqESHFbou4Yt1EGZGalU7e0YcJN
[41] BUZZ High Performance Computing
https://www.buzzhpc.ai/
[42] LLM's cost is decreasing by 10x each year for constant ... - Reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1gpr2p4/llms_cost_is_decreasing_by_10x_each_year_for/
